Student Interns: Employees Or Not?

The classification of student interns as employees has been a subject of debate, with the answer depending on various factors. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) imposes a federal minimum wage that employers must pay anyone defined as an employee, and this definition has been interpreted differently by various courts. While the FLSA does not specifically define interns as employees, the Department of Labor has outlined criteria to determine whether an intern should be classified as an employee, including the extent to which the internship is educational, tied to the intern's academic calendar, and whether there is an expectation of compensation. The classification also depends on whether the intern is a primary or secondary beneficiary, with the primary beneficiary being the one who should be compensated. This classification is crucial as it determines whether interns are entitled to wages, overtime, and other benefits, and misclassification can lead to legal consequences for employers.

Are student interns considered employees?

Unpaid internships and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

Unpaid internships are a common feature of student life, offering valuable insights into a particular career path. However, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) has raised concerns about the potential exploitation of interns as unpaid workers. The FLSA requires a minimum wage and overtime pay for employees, and the question of whether interns are classified as employees is crucial.

The FLSA does not provide a clear definition of an "employee", and court cases have not yet established a definitive set of rules. However, several key factors have emerged to help determine whether an intern should be classified as an employee. These factors include the extent to which the internship benefits the intern, the level of supervision provided, and whether the intern's work displaces that of regular employees. If the internship is primarily for the benefit of the intern, with adequate supervision and without displacing paid employees, then it is less likely that the intern will be considered an employee under the FLSA.

The Department of Labor (DOL) has issued criteria to clarify the distinction between interns and employees. These criteria include the understanding between the intern and the employer that the internship is unpaid and will not lead to a paid position. Additionally, the DOL has emphasized that internships in the private sector are more likely to be considered employment unless they meet specific exclusion criteria. In contrast, unpaid internships in the public sector and for non-profit organizations are generally permissible.

To address the ambiguity in the classification of interns, courts have employed the "primary beneficiary test". This test examines the “economic reality” of the intern-employer relationship to identify which party primarily benefits from the arrangement. Factors considered include the expectation of compensation, the similarity of the internship to educational training, and the integration of the internship with the intern's formal education program. If the court finds that the intern is primarily serving their interests, they are less likely to be considered employees under the FLSA.

Internships and workers' compensation

Whether or not an intern is considered an employee depends on various factors. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) does not offer a clear definition of an employee, and the Supreme Court has not provided any clarification. However, recent court cases have established some key principles. These include assessing whether the intern works for their benefit to learn a profession, whether the company derives the primary benefit from the intern's work, and whether the intern displaces paid employees. If any of these factors are missing, the intern is likely to be classified as an employee and entitled to wages and other protections under the FLSA.

The Department of Labor (DOL) has provided six criteria to determine if an internship is legal and unpaid:

• The internship is similar to training given in an educational environment.
• The internship is for the benefit of the intern.
• The intern works under the close supervision of existing staff without displacing regular employees.
• The employer does not derive immediate advantage from the intern's activities and may even have their operations impeded.
• The intern and employer understand that there is no entitlement to a paid job at the end of the internship.
• The internship is of a fixed duration, agreed upon before the start.

Unpaid interns may not be considered "employees" in the traditional sense, but they are generally still eligible for workers' compensation benefits. In the case of paid internships, interns are legally treated as employees and are automatically eligible for workers' compensation. This provides a safety net in the form of medical benefits, wage replacement, and rehabilitation services if they suffer a workplace injury or illness. The specific benefits covered by workers' compensation insurance vary from state to state.

It is important for interns to be aware of workplace hazards and safety protocols. Companies are required to provide training and notice to interns about workplace safety and reporting requirements for injuries. Additionally, interns should understand their classification and whether they are considered "casual" workers, which can impact their eligibility for workers' compensation coverage.

Interns as employees in the public sector

The classification of interns as employees is a complex issue that has been the subject of recent lawsuits and enforcement actions. While the answer varies depending on the specific circumstances and location, there are some general principles that can be applied to interns in the public sector.

Firstly, it is important to distinguish between the private and public sectors. Unpaid internships in the public sector and for non-profit charitable organisations are generally permissible, as interns are often considered volunteers who do not expect compensation. The US Department of Labor (DOL) has emphasised that internships in the private sector will typically be viewed as employment unless they meet specific exclusion criteria.

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) imposes a federal minimum wage that must be paid to anyone defined as an "employee" under the act. This includes interns, regardless of their title or whether they receive academic credit. The FLSA, however, does not provide a clear definition of an "employee," and the US Supreme Court has not provided a ruling on this matter.

To determine whether an intern in the public sector is considered an employee, several factors must be considered. These include the extent to which the internship provides training similar to an educational environment, whether the internship is tied to the intern's formal education program, and whether the intern understands that they are not entitled to wages. If the internship is arranged to fit the intern's academic calendar and provides skills and experience as defined by the internship program, the intern is likely to be considered the primary beneficiary and not an employee.

Additionally, if the internship involves close supervision by existing staff and does not displace regular employees, it is less likely to be considered employment. The public sector employer should also not derive immediate advantage from the intern's activities.

In summary, while the classification of interns as employees in the public sector can be complex, considering factors such as the nature of the work, the level of supervision, and the expectations of compensation can help determine whether an intern should be classified as an employee.

Interns' academic commitments and compensation

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) addresses the issue of interns' compensation, which is currently dictated by the "primary beneficiary test". The FLSA requires that a minimum wage and overtime be paid to covered employees. However, this does not always apply to interns, who are often not considered employees. If an intern is classified as a trainee, volunteer, or student, they may not be entitled to minimum wage or overtime pay under the FLSA.

Unpaid internships are common, and many interns are not compensated for their work. This can place a significant financial burden on interns, especially if they are required to pay tuition or other fees associated with their internship. In some cases, interns may even have to pay for academic credits and complete corresponding coursework to receive them. This can result in a substantial financial burden, especially if the internship is unpaid or underfunded.

To address this issue, some organizations, such as NACE, advocate for providing financial compensation to all interns. They argue that unpaid internships perpetuate a cycle of inequity and place an undue financial burden on students. Additionally, more than half of those who serve as interns are later hired by the companies they intern for, and those new employees are often paid more than new hires who did not intern. This further emphasizes the value of internships and the potential for them to be fairly compensated.

The Department of Labor Standards (DLS) determines who can work as an unpaid intern or volunteer. Unpaid internships are generally permissible in the public sector and for non-profit charitable organizations when the intern volunteers without expecting compensation. However, internships in the private sector are typically viewed as employment unless they meet specific exclusion criteria. These criteria include factors such as the benefit gained by the intern and the employer, the level of supervision required, and whether the intern displaces regular employees.

To summarize, interns' academic commitments and compensation vary depending on the organization and the applicable laws and regulations. While some interns may be unpaid, there is a growing recognition that unpaid internships can create financial challenges for students and lead to inequities. Organizations like NACE are advocating for change, and it is essential for employers to be aware of and comply with federal, state, and local laws regarding interns' classification and compensation.

The risks of misclassifying student interns

The classification of interns as employees has been a subject of debate, with recent court rulings affirming that interns should be treated as employees, thus prompting discussions on the legal obligations of employers in internship programs. This has brought to light the risks associated with misclassifying student interns.

Firstly, misclassifying interns can result in legal challenges for employers. In a recent court ruling, it was affirmed that interns are indeed employees, and thus, protected by the Employment Act, which includes apprentices and indentured learners in the definition of an 'employee'. This ruling has sparked discussions on fair labour practices and the need for employers to comply with federal, state, and local laws regarding worker classification.

Secondly, misclassification can lead to costly financial liabilities for businesses. In the United States, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires 'for-profit' employers to pay employees minimum wages and overtime pay for their work. By misclassifying interns as unpaid, businesses risk major fines and other consequences. This is a common mistake, and businesses are advised to seek guidance from HR consultants or legal experts to ensure compliance with state and federal laws.

Thirdly, misclassifying interns may result in the denial of important benefits and protections, such as workers' compensation coverage, to which they are entitled as employees. This can lead to potential legal and financial liabilities for the employer if an intern suffers a workplace injury or illness. Employers have a responsibility to ensure the safety and well-being of their interns, regardless of their classification.

Furthermore, misclassification can impact the employer's ability to secure adequate insurance coverage. In the case of workers' compensation policies, misclassifying an employee can result in insufficient policy premiums to cover the actual risk exposure.

To avoid the risks associated with misclassifying student interns, it is crucial for employers to carefully design internship programs that comply with legal requirements and ensure fair treatment of interns. This includes considering factors such as the extent to which the internship provides training similar to an educational environment, the expectation of compensation, and the benefits received by the intern versus the company.

Frequently asked questions