Universities Molding Students: Who Owns The Final Product?

The idea that students are customers and universities are retailers has been gaining traction in recent years. The retail business model has become the de facto model for higher education, with universities adopting strategies to attract and retain students. This shift has led to students viewing themselves as customers and feeling entitled to certain outcomes, such as higher grades and better job prospects. However, this mindset may negatively impact their educational experience and outcomes. While universities do provide a service, the product of higher education is knowledge, which is co-created by students and their teachers. Students are consumers of this knowledge, not customers of the university.

Students as customers

The idea that students are customers of universities is a highly debated topic. The concept stems from the belief that

Students as co-creators of knowledge

The question of whether students are a product of universities is a complex one, with various perspectives and arguments. Some view students as consumers of the product of higher education, which is knowledge. This perspective recognises that students pay for and use the product of higher education, but also acknowledges that higher education was created to produce informed citizens for a democratic society.

However, the notion of students as consumers has been criticised for its negative impact on the quality of their engagement with their education. This perspective positions students as passive recipients of knowledge, which may hinder their active participation in the learning process.

An alternative view sees students as co-creators of knowledge, recognising that learning is a collaborative process between students and teachers. This perspective shifts the focus from students as consumers to their role as active contributors to the educational experience.

Adopting a service-dominant logic, universities can be conceived as service ecosystems where students are active players in co-creating their education. This approach highlights the importance of building an ecosystem that promotes a better learning experience for students.

Ultimately, the student-as-customer metaphor has limitations and fails to capture the dynamic nature of the student-university relationship. Students are not merely consumers or products but play a more complex and active role in their educational journey.

Student satisfaction

There are several factors that contribute to student satisfaction. These include the competitiveness and intelligence of the students, school resources and facilities, teacher support and involvement, school administration, and the overall happiness of students with their choice of institution. Universities can enhance student satisfaction by focusing on these areas and ensuring that students have a positive and meaningful experience during their time on campus.

One way to assess student satisfaction is through surveys and feedback. Universities can gather feedback from current and former students to understand their experiences and identify areas for improvement. This information can be used to make informed decisions about curriculum, teaching methods, and campus resources. Additionally, universities can compare their satisfaction ratings with those of other institutions to identify strengths and weaknesses and set goals for improvement.

Another factor that can impact student satisfaction is the perception of value for money. With the rising cost of higher education, students and their families want to ensure that their investment is worthwhile. Universities need to demonstrate the value of their programs and the return on investment, whether it is through enhanced career prospects, personal growth, or other benefits.

Furthermore, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has also shifted the perspective on student satisfaction. With the residential aspect of the college experience temporarily removed, students and faculty had to adapt to online learning. This shift highlighted the importance of academic and non-academic "extras" that contribute to the overall university experience. Universities had to re-evaluate their value proposition and ensure that students felt they were getting their money's worth, even without the traditional on-campus experience.

In conclusion, student satisfaction is a critical aspect of the higher education landscape. By listening to student feedback, addressing their concerns, and providing a well-rounded and valuable educational experience, universities can enhance student satisfaction and, ultimately, improve student retention and graduation rates.

Student involvement

The concept of students as customers of universities is a highly debated topic. While some argue that students are the consumers of the product of knowledge that universities offer, others believe that students are not customers but are instead partners in the learning experience.

The former view – that students are customers – has been influenced by the marketisation of higher education and competition between institutions. This has resulted in universities adopting a retail industry approach, with students demanding more for their money. This includes better facilities, more contact hours, and higher grades.

However, this consumerist mindset can negatively impact the quality of education. Students who view themselves as customers may feel entitled to certain outcomes, such as higher grades, and may adopt a passive approach to studying. This can lead to lower academic performance and dissatisfaction with their course.

On the other hand, some argue that students are not customers but are instead co-creators or co-producers of knowledge alongside their teachers. This view recognises the need for students to remain active participants in their education.

Ultimately, the student-as-customer model may undermine the role of the student in actively participating in the learning process. It shifts the focus from learning to obtaining a degree, threatening the non-salable components of higher education such as study time and contact hours.

To increase student involvement, universities should focus on building student satisfaction rather than defining the student's role as a customer. This could include improving administrative services, offering state-of-the-art technology, and providing a variety of essential services on campus.

Additionally, universities should not treat students as customers in the classroom. Students should earn their grades through intellectual effort rather than expecting to buy them. This maintains the integrity of the educational process and encourages active student participation.

Student success

The idea that students are a product of universities is a contentious issue. Some sources argue that students are consumers of the product of higher education, which is knowledge. Others suggest that students are customers of universities, especially with the rising cost of tuition fees. However, some disagree with this notion, stating that students are not customers in the classroom, and that they earn their grades through learning and working hard, rather than buying them.

The rise of tuition fees has led to a shift in the perception of students, with universities adopting a more business-like model, and students becoming more demanding. This has resulted in a greater focus on customer service and satisfaction, with universities competing to attract students. This has also led to a debate about the role of the student, with some suggesting that students are co-creators of their education, rather than simply consumers.

The impact of COVID-19 has also played a part in this shift, with the move to online learning removing the traditional residential aspect of university life. This has caused students to question the value of what they are receiving, and whether it is worth the cost.

The idea of students as customers has implications for the relationship between students and faculty. Some argue that it leads to a decrease in academic standards, with students expecting higher grades and more concessions. It also affects the role of the faculty, who may feel pressured to relax standards and focus more on customer satisfaction than on academic rigour.

Overall, while there are arguments for viewing students as customers or consumers, it is important to recognise that the primary role of students is to learn and engage with their education. Treating them solely as customers may have negative consequences for their academic success and the quality of their university experience.

Frequently asked questions