University Coordinator-Student Relationships: Ethical Or Not?

The relationship between university staff and students is a complex issue, and it is essential to consider the potential power dynamics and ethical implications. While a coordinator at a university may not have the same level of authority as a professor, there is still an inherent power imbalance that could impact the dating dynamic. This power imbalance, combined with the vulnerability of students, could create an unethical situation. However, it is worth noting that the specific policies and ethical guidelines of each university should be considered when exploring this topic further.

Power dynamics and ethics

In the context of a university, the coordinator-student relationship is similar to that of a student counselor. The coordinator is responsible for providing administrative and social support to students, including setting up housing, planning events, and helping those struggling academically. This role demands strong organisational skills, empathy, and the ability to handle multiple priorities. While the opportunity to positively impact students' lives is rewarding, the stress may arise from navigating varied challenges and demands. Effective communication and problem-solving skills are crucial for success in this role.

When a coordinator dates a student, the power dynamic becomes even more pronounced. The coordinator has direct influence over the student's academic and personal life, creating a conflict of interest. The coordinator might be in a position to favour the student they are dating, providing them with advantages over other students. Conversely, if the relationship were to sour, the coordinator could also negatively impact the student's academic standing or personal life.

Additionally, the potential for coercion is heightened. The student might feel pressured to continue the relationship out of fear of academic repercussions or loss of support. This dynamic can interfere with the student's learning and personal development, which is contrary to the university's educational mission. Furthermore, such situations may expose the university and the coordinator to liability for violation of laws against sexual harassment and sex discrimination.

To maintain ethical standards, it is generally advised that coordinators avoid dating students. This helps to preserve the integrity of the coordinator-student relationship and ensures that students are treated fairly and impartially. Universities often have policies in place to prevent such relationships, and violations can result in disciplinary action. While it may be challenging to completely avoid romantic connections within the university environment, it is important for coordinators to prioritise the well-being and success of students over personal interests.

University policies

Universities that prohibit such relationships do so for several reasons. Firstly, the unequal power dynamic between staff and students can lead to coercion or the perception of favouritism. This can impair the learning environment for other students and expose the university to liability for violation of laws against sexual harassment and sex discrimination. Additionally, staff members who have direct pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities over a student with whom they are in a relationship may be unable to fulfil their duties impartially.

Some universities require staff-student relationships to be registered or disclosed to avoid potential conflicts of interest and protect both parties. This transparency can help to ensure that the staff member does not end up in a position of direct supervision over their partner.

It is worth noting that the potential issues arising from staff-student relationships can depend on the specific circumstances, such as the age and maturity of the student, the nature of the staff member's role, and the likelihood of the staff member having pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities over the student in the future.

In summary, while university policies on staff-student relationships vary, it is important to prioritise the integrity of the teacher-student relationship, avoid potential conflicts of interest, and protect the well-being and learning environment of all students.

Conflict of interest

A student services coordinator's role is to support students by providing administrative and social support, including setting up housing, planning community events, and helping those struggling academically. The role demands strong organisational skills, empathy, and the ability to handle multiple priorities simultaneously.

The coordinator must act as a central point of contact for students, offering assistance and guidance on academic, personal, and administrative matters. They must also address and resolve student concerns and conflicts, serving as a mediator when necessary, and promoting a positive and respectful campus culture.

A coordinator must also maintain accurate and confidential student records, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations and university policies. They must also communicate regularly with students, providing updates, information, and reminders about important deadlines or events.

The integrity of the teacher-student relationship is the foundation of the university's educational mission. This relationship vests considerable trust in the teacher, who, in turn, bears authority and accountability as a mentor, educator, and evaluator. The unequal power dynamic inherent in this relationship heightens the vulnerability of the student and the potential for coercion.

The pedagogical relationship between teacher and student must be protected from influences or activities that can interfere with learning and personal development. A sexual or romantic relationship between a teacher and a student is inappropriate and must be avoided. Such a relationship jeopardises the integrity of the educational process by creating a conflict of interest and may impair the learning environment for other students.

Therefore, a teacher must avoid a sexual relationship with a student over whom they have or might reasonably expect to have direct pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities, regardless of whether the relationship is consensual.

Undergraduate students are particularly vulnerable due to their age and relative lack of maturity. Therefore, no teacher shall have a sexual or amorous relationship with any undergraduate student, regardless of whether the teacher currently exercises or expects to have any pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities over that student.

A coordinator at a university is in a position of power and influence over students. Dating a student could impair the coordinator's ability to perform their duties impartially and without favouritism. It could also create an uncomfortable environment for the student and their peers, potentially impacting their education.

Additionally, the university and the coordinator could be exposed to legal liability for violation of laws against sexual harassment and sex discrimination.

Therefore, it is generally not appropriate for a coordinator at a university to date a student due to the potential conflict of interest and the power imbalance between the two parties.

Student vulnerability

Students are vulnerable to sexual and dating violence due to their involvement in social activities on campus, such as parties, the "hookup culture", and initiation into the Greek system. Substance use among college students is also a common correlate of college dating violence experiences.

In the context of online dating, college students are at risk of sexual assault due to the amount of personal information they share on dating sites. When individuals join a dating site, they create a profile disclosing their personal information. Some dating sites ask users a series of questions to gather more personal information, which may not have been initially disclosed when creating the profile. Connections may happen which allows access to their more personal information, especially if other social media platforms are linked, with additional personal details, and information about their friends and family made available.

Another factor that makes college students vulnerable to sexual assault is the culture of hooking up. For some people, online dating is a method of meeting someone and facilitating a hookup. While the activities involved in a hookup can vary, it always entails some sort of sexual act. Even in cases where both parties were interested in hooking up, studies have found 75% of campus sexual assaults occurred in the context of a hookup.

College students have many unique circumstances which increase their vulnerability to sexual assault. The use of online dating apps is popular among many college students. The risk of using online dating and sexual assault is often not addressed in preventive efforts. For some college students, navigating a new school system, city, and state is a daunting task. If there is a student who had difficulty making friends or joining organizations, online dating is an easy way to meet new people and try to mitigate the loneliness of not having friends or being in a new city. Predators will often look for lonely people and prey on their needs to make connections and exploit them.

On the other hand, some students may come from small communities or backgrounds in which being a potential victim of violence is not a reality in their community, but is a risk in the college community, leaving some students more vulnerable to predators.

Potential for coercion

The potential for coercion is a significant concern when a university staff member dates a student. This is because the staff member holds a position of power and influence over the student, which can create an inherent power imbalance and risk of coercion or abuse of authority.

University staff members, including coordinators, professors, and faculty, have professional responsibilities that can impact the status and circumstances of students. This includes making relevant administrative decisions and taking actions related to funding, visas, healthcare, housing, and academic opportunities. When a staff member is in a position to influence these aspects of a student's life, there is a potential for coercion and abuse of power.

For example, a coordinator could use their position to offer favourable treatment to a student they are dating, such as providing additional financial aid or better housing assignments. They may also have access to sensitive information about the student, such as their mental health records, which could be used to exert pressure or control. In some cases, the staff member may even be in a position to evaluate or grade the student's work, creating a direct conflict of interest.

Additionally, the power dynamic between a university staff member and a student can be complex and multifaceted. The staff member may have authority or influence over the student not only in their professional capacity but also in their personal interactions. This dynamic can make it difficult for the student to provide truly informed consent and may create an environment where coercion or manipulation is more likely to occur.

To address these concerns, many universities have implemented policies prohibiting or restricting romantic and sexual relationships between staff members and students. These policies aim to protect students from potential coercion, harassment, or abuse of power and to maintain a safe and ethical learning environment. They also help to uphold academic integrity and prevent conflicts of interest that could impact the student's educational opportunities and outcomes.

Frequently asked questions