International Student Athletes: Nil Deals And Opportunities

International student athletes have been unable to benefit from NIL deals in the US due to a lack of clear federal guidance and immigration law expertise. This has resulted in confusion and a missed opportunity to earn money from their name, image, and likeness (NIL). While they can earn money in their home countries, they are barred from doing so in the US, which has led to equity issues and a loss of potential earnings. However, there are indications that international student athletes can pursue NIL deals on a case-by-case basis, and a new bill in Congress could open up opportunities for them.

Can international student athletes get NIL deals?

International student athletes are unable to work in the US

The issue of NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) compensation for international student-athletes in the US is complex. NIL deals are prohibited for international student-athletes, which means they cannot profit from activities such as autograph sessions, apparel lines, private lessons, or social media influencing. This has led to concerns about equity, as international student-athletes are excluded from the burgeoning NIL industry, missing out on potential earnings.

While international student-athletes cannot receive NIL compensation in the US, they may be able to receive money from international sponsors or sources outside of the US. However, the specifics of this are unclear, and there are concerns about potential loopholes in the NIL scheme. International student-athletes can also work on-campus, typically in positions that tie into their degree, such as in a lab or as a graduate assistant. Additionally, changes to US immigration law may be necessary to allow international athletes to continue participating in NCAA sports if they are classified as employees.

To compete in the NCAA, international student-athletes must meet academic and amateurism requirements, including completing 16 NCAA-approved core-course credits, earning a minimum GPA, and adhering to amateurism rules. They are responsible for registering with the NCAA Eligibility Center and maintaining their eligibility by tracking their academic progress and amateurism status. International student-athletes should also be aware of potential cultural differences, such as the use of terms like "grad year" to refer to the year of high school graduation and the intended year of college enrolment.

International student athletes can earn money in their home countries

International student athletes can also earn money in their home countries by getting international sponsors. For example, an international DI student-athlete in football who won a medal for their country in some international competition might receive money and gifts from sponsors and the government in their home country. However, it is unclear whether this is an infraction that should be reported to the NCAA.

Another way for international student athletes to earn money in their home countries is to work for their university. For example, they could work on campus in a lab or as a graduate assistant. They could also do work that is tied to their degree, such as providing private tennis lessons or becoming a social media influencer for a company.

It is important to note that international student athletes should be careful about discussing their NIL deals with the wrong people, as this could lead to their SEVIS record or I-20 being terminated. They should also be sure to have proof that they were in their home country when they signed any documents that resulted in money, such as a passport stamp.

International student athletes are subject to immigration laws and regulations

International student athletes are subject to a variety of immigration laws and regulations that can impact their ability to participate in NIL deals. These laws and regulations vary depending on the country and the specific visa held by the athlete. For example, in the United States, international student athletes with an F-1 visa face restrictions on their ability to engage in NIL activities due to the visa's limitations on employment. This has resulted in thousands of international student athletes being unable to fully participate in the NIL industry, which is estimated to be worth billions of dollars.

The location of the student athlete is a crucial factor in determining the applicability of immigration laws and regulations. As per US immigration law, the location of the athlete performing an activity takes precedence over the location of the business or payment origin. Therefore, international student athletes can explore NIL opportunities in their home countries or outside the US without violating immigration laws. However, they must be cautious about the type of NIL engagement, as active engagements that require their labour may conflict with visa guidelines.

To navigate the complex landscape, international student athletes and their institutions should seek guidance from federal agency opinions, labour law, and tax law. The absence of clear federal guidance on NIL for international athletes has led to confusion and a need for clarification from government agencies overseeing foreign student visas. This lack of clarity has resulted in international student athletes missing out on NIL opportunities and potential earnings.

While the majority of discussions focus on the limitations imposed by immigration laws, it is worth noting that certain visa types and strategic planning can enable international student athletes to pursue NIL deals. For instance, athletes with exceptional abilities in sports or other fields may qualify for a P-1 visa, which provides more flexibility for NIL engagements. Additionally, completing NIL deals in an athlete's home country, as demonstrated by the case of Aaliyah Edwards, can be a viable option.

In conclusion, international student athletes must carefully navigate the immigration laws and regulations of their host country to ensure compliance while also exploring the available avenues for NIL participation. The dynamic nature of this field, with new bills and legislative efforts, underscores the importance of staying informed and seeking expert advice to maximize opportunities while adhering to legal requirements.

International student athletes on F-1 visas face strict limitations

The location of the student athlete is a critical factor. U.S. immigration laws do not impose restrictions on international student athletes when they are physically outside the United States. As a result, some international athletes have pursued NIL opportunities in their home countries or during international trips. However, engaging in active NIL deals within the United States is more challenging due to visa restrictions.

Active NIL engagements typically involve the labor of athletes, such as posting on social media, attending events, or signing autographs. These types of engagements are prevalent in the industry as they align with the influencer economy. However, such active deals may conflict with F-1 visa guidelines on employment for international students. In contrast, passive NIL engagements, which do not require labor from athletes, are less likely to violate visa restrictions. An example of a passive engagement is group licensing payments for a video game that uses the athlete's name, image, and likeness.

The lack of clear federal guidance and expertise in immigration law among athletic administrators has led to confusion and limited opportunities for international student athletes. While there have been calls for clarifications from government agencies, the current landscape presents challenges for international athletes aiming to maximize their NIL potential. As a result, international student athletes may seek alternative visa options, such as the P1-A visa, or explore unique case-by-case scenarios to pursue NIL deals, often in their home countries.

International student athletes can receive NIL deals in their home countries

International student athletes have been left out of the burgeoning NIL industry, with more than 20,000 NCAA athletes unable to benefit from it. This has resulted in a loss of $13.28 million in potential earnings. The primary reason for this disparity is the lack of clear federal guidance on NIL for international students, leading to confusion and a cautious approach by educational institutions.

However, it is important to note that international student athletes can receive NIL deals in their home countries. This is because, from an immigration law perspective, the location of the student-athlete performing the activity is of utmost importance. As long as the athlete is physically outside the United States, there are no US immigration law restrictions. For example, Canadian student-athlete Aaliyah Edwards, a UCONN women's basketball star, returned to Canada and signed a major deal with Adidas. Similarly, Camryn Rogers, a world champion hammer thrower, was able to pursue NIL deals in her final year of NCAA eligibility by obtaining a P1-A visa.

International student athletes can also explore passive NIL engagements, which do not require their active labour. These include group licensing payments, such as those made by EA Sports to use athletes' names, images, likenesses, voices, and jersey numbers in their video games. Additionally, international athletes can work on-campus as graduate assistants or in labs, as long as the work is tied to their degree.

While there is pending legislation in Congress that could improve NIL access for international student athletes, the current landscape requires these athletes to be creative and explore opportunities outside the United States to monetise their NIL.

Frequently asked questions