Black Students At University Of Michigan Demand Segregated Spaces

The University of Michigan has been criticised for its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies, with some claiming that the university's efforts were a well-meaning failure. In December 2024, the university announced that it would no longer require diversity statements in hiring decisions, sparking debate among students. While some students expressed disappointment, others agreed with the decision, arguing that students should be selected based on merit rather than race or gender. However, the university has also faced a federal civil rights complaint regarding a race-based program, with allegations of segregated events for BIPOC and white ally students.

University of Michigan ends required diversity statements

The University of Michigan has ended the requirement for diversity statements in its hiring, promotion, and tenure decisions. The decision, announced by Provost Laurie McCauley, comes as the university's regents weigh a broader overhaul of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.

The university's DEI programs have come under scrutiny after a New York Times investigation found that the university had spent a quarter of a billion dollars since 2016 on DEI efforts, with 56% of that amount going towards salaries and benefits for DEI staff. Despite this investment, Black student enrollment has remained around 5% for nearly a decade (currently sitting at 6.1%).

In response to the investigation, McCauley commended the university's previous work on DEI and pledged to continue examining how such practices are implemented. She stated that "diversity, equity, and inclusion are three of our core values at the university," and that their collective efforts have "produced important strides in opening opportunities for all people."

The decision to end required diversity statements follows a recommendation by an eight-member faculty working group, which was tasked with exploring the use of diversity statements in faculty hiring and promotion. The group found that most responding faculty agreed that diversity statements put pressure on faculty to express specific positions on moral, political, or social issues. Additionally, slightly more disagreed than agreed that these statements allowed the institution to demonstrate a commitment to DEI by cultivating it within the faculty.

The University of Michigan's decision adds to a growing trend of restricting the use of diversity statements in academia. While some students at the university expressed disappointment in the removal of diversity statements, others felt that it was unnecessary and that students should be selected based on their merits rather than race or gender.

Students express disappointment

Students at the University of Michigan expressed disappointment and concern over the school's decision to end required diversity statements for faculty hiring, promotion, and tenure decisions. The move has sparked a range of reactions, with some students worried about the impact on minority representation and the need to address societal issues, while others feel that DEI initiatives were ineffective or unnecessary.

One student, Ben, a graduate student, expressed that "there should be precautions in place to encourage people to think about the societal problems that continue to persist today." Schnaede, a theater and cognitive science sophomore, called the decision "slightly worrying," suggesting that it should have been made by a broader segment of the university community, including faculty, students, and staff. Another sophomore, Michael, studying data science engineering, called the decision "a little sad," indicating that DEI is an important issue that warrants attention.

On the other hand, some students welcomed the change. Joseph, a senior studying architecture, was critical of DEI, stating that students are "unique" and should not be selected based on race or gender. Evan, a double major in economics and film, television, and media, shared a similar sentiment, questioning whether his learning disabilities gave him an advantage over other applicants.

Previously, Black students at the University of Michigan had also criticized the school's DEI initiatives, calling them "superficial" and expressing a "general discomfort with naming Blackness explicitly." Princess-J'Maria Mboup, the speaker of the university's Black Student Union, noted that marginalized communities were invested in the work but not in DEI itself.

The University of Michigan's decision comes amid a broader trend of universities reevaluating and rolling back DEI initiatives. The university's provost, Laurie McCauley, stated that they would continuously refine their approach to diversity, equity, and inclusion. However, some students worry about the impact of these changes on campus inclusiveness and representation for minority students.

University dismantles DEI initiatives

The University of Michigan has become the latest college to roll back Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives as the trend goes national. The university will no longer require diversity statements as part of faculty hiring, promotion, and tenure decisions, marking a significant shift for one of the country's leading public research institutions.

The decision to end required diversity statements was announced by Provost Laurie McCauley, following a recommendation from an eight-member faculty working group. The group criticized diversity statements for their potential to limit freedom of expression and diversity of thought on campus. However, the university chose not to implement two other recommendations from the working group: integrating DEI content into teaching, research, and service statements; and enhancing training on writing and assessing these statements.

The move by the University of Michigan is part of a broader shift away from DEI initiatives in academia and beyond. Several other public universities have also rolled back their DEI initiatives and requirements. Following Senate Bill 17, Texas public universities eliminated DEI offices, positions, and mandatory training. The University of North Carolina system redirected funds from DEI initiatives to public safety and discontinued DEI programs on campuses. Iowa's public universities began eliminating DEI offices and reallocating funds after a state law passed earlier this year.

These changes come amid growing efforts to restrict the use of diversity statements, which have become common in academia. While supporters argue that they help public universities hire more diverse faculties, critics claim they stifle free speech and freedom of thought. The University of Michigan's decision adds momentum to the movement to restrict such statements.

The university's Black Student Union speaker, Princess-J'Maria Mboup, commented that marginalized communities are "invested in the work, but not in DEI itself." This reflects a broader sentiment among students, with some expressing disappointment and worry about the removal of diversity statements. However, others feel that students should be selected based on merit rather than race or gender.

Black students criticise DEI initiatives

Black students at the University of Michigan have criticised the school's DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) initiatives, calling them a "well-meaning failure". Despite the institution's programs, Black students have expressed dissatisfaction, citing a ""general discomfort with naming Blackness explicitly".

The University of Michigan has been a leader in DEI principles, spending lavishly on DEI offices and hiring DEI radicals. However, Black students feel that these efforts have not led to significant advances in their enrollment, which remains at around four percent. Furthermore, some students have become less likely to interact with people of different backgrounds or races as the program has been implemented.

Princess-J'Maria Mboup, the speaker of the university's Black Student Union, stated that "the students who are most affected by DEI—meaning marginalised communities—are invested in the work, but not in DEI itself." This sentiment reflects a sense of disconnect between the intentions of the initiatives and the actual experiences of Black students on campus.

In response to these criticisms, the University of Michigan has ended the requirement for diversity statements in faculty hiring, promotion, and tenure decisions. This decision marks a shift in policy for the university, which had previously been known for its ambitious and well-financed DEI programs. While some students have expressed disappointment in this rollback of DEI initiatives, others feel that it is a step towards fostering a more inclusive environment.

The University of Michigan's experience highlights the complexities and challenges of implementing DEI initiatives in academic institutions. While the intention to create a more diverse and inclusive campus is commendable, the execution and impact of these programs have been questioned by those they aim to benefit. It remains to be seen whether the university's new approach will address the concerns raised by Black students and lead to more meaningful representation and inclusion.

University sued for segregated, racially discriminatory program

The University of Minnesota has been hit with a federal civil rights complaint regarding a race-based program, and it is not the first time the university has been under scrutiny for its racially discriminatory programs. The latest complaint, filed by the Legal Insurrection Foundation's Equal Protection Project, alleges that the university's Design Justice program segregates students by race. The program is only open to BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) students, with separate events for "white allies." Bill Jacobson, president of the Legal Insurrection Foundation, called the program "one of the more outrageous programs" his organization has seen, and stated that it violates the equal protection guarantee of the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Law of 1964.

This incident is not isolated to the University of Minnesota, as several other universities have also been criticized for their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The University of Michigan, for example, has recently ended its required diversity statements for faculty hiring, promotion, and tenure decisions. While some students expressed disappointment, others criticized the DEI initiatives as superficial and failing to increase the enrollment of Black students. Similar rollbacks of DEI initiatives have occurred at the University of Texas at Austin, Texas A&M, the University of North Carolina, and Iowa's three public universities.

The criticism of DEI programs extends beyond universities, as President-elect Trump has vowed to eliminate such programs in federal agencies. In 2020, Trump issued an executive order banning "divisive" training for federal contractors, and during his campaign, he suggested reforming the accreditation system and "taxing, fining, and suing" universities that rely on DEI for faculty hiring. Despite this, the Biden-Harris administration has encouraged DEI initiatives across several sectors of the federal government.

The debate surrounding DEI in higher education and beyond remains contentious, with arguments being made about the effectiveness of these programs in creating diverse and inclusive environments. While some argue that DEI initiatives are necessary to address societal problems and create equal opportunities, others criticize them for stifling free speech and freedom of thought, creating unnecessary racial divisions, and failing to achieve their intended goals.

Frequently asked questions