University Of Phoenix: Defrauding Students Or Quality Education?

The University of Phoenix has been accused of defrauding students by making false claims about post-graduation job opportunities. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged the for-profit university with falsely advertising relationships and job opportunities with top companies, including AT&T, Microsoft, Yahoo!, Twitter, and the American Red Cross. The FTC's 2019 lawsuit resulted in a record-breaking $191 million settlement, with the University of Phoenix agreeing to pay $50 million in cash and cancel $141 million in student debt. The University of Phoenix has also faced other lawsuits and investigations related to deceptive marketing, fraudulent business activities, and violations of state and federal laws.

False advertising of job opportunities

The University of Phoenix has faced accusations of defrauding students through false advertising of job opportunities. In 2019, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged the university and its parent company, Apollo Education Group, with falsely claiming relationships and job opportunities with top companies. The FTC alleged that the university used deceptive marketing to lure students, specifically targeting Hispanic and military service members. As a result of the FTC's enforcement action, the University of Phoenix agreed to a $191 million settlement, which included $50 million in direct payments to students and $141 million in cancelled debt owed directly to the school.

Another form of false advertising is misrepresenting the nature of the work. For example, a company might advertise a position as a white-collar, career-type job, only for the employee to discover that it is actually a door-to-door sales role requiring the use of their personal vehicle. Similarly, companies might use fancy job titles to attract more qualified applicants, even though the job duties are menial or unrelated to the title.

To avoid being misled by false advertising of job opportunities, job seekers should be cautious and conduct thorough research. They should look beyond appealing job titles and ask detailed questions about the role, company partnerships, and career advancement opportunities. By being vigilant and informed, job seekers can protect themselves from deceptive hiring practices and make more informed career decisions.

Misleading advertising campaigns

The University of Phoenix has been accused of misleading advertising campaigns. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged the for-profit university with falsely claiming relationships and job opportunities with top companies. The FTC's 2019 complaint alleged that the university and its parent company, Apollo Education Group, Inc., falsely claimed that their relationships with top companies created job opportunities for students and that they worked with these companies to develop their curriculum. The FTC charged that the companies used a multimedia ad campaign to attract students, including ads specifically targeted at military and Latino consumers.

The University of Phoenix's "Let's Get to Work" campaign featured several high-profile employers, including Microsoft, Twitter, Adobe, and Yahoo!, giving the false impression that the university worked with those companies to create job opportunities for its students. The ads ran from 2012 to 2014.

The FTC claimed that the ads featuring these employers could give potential students the impression that the school had connections with these employers or tailored its education to make its students specifically attractive to those companies. However, the school was not affiliated with any of those employers and did not tailor its curriculum to the requirements of those fields.

The University of Phoenix agreed to pay a $50 million settlement in cash to the FTC and forgive more than $140 million in student loan debt owed by students who may have been harmed by the deceptive claims.

Misrepresentation of relationships with employers

The University of Phoenix was accused of engaging in deceptive advertising and misleading prospective students about its relationships with top companies and job opportunities for graduates. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleged that the university falsely claimed that its relationships with companies like Microsoft, Twitter, Adobe, Yahoo!, and the American Red Cross created job opportunities specifically for its students. The FTC also claimed that the university misrepresented its relationships with other employers, including Avis, MGM, Newell Rubbermaid, and Sodexo.

In its marketing materials, the University of Phoenix featured logos and names of these companies, giving the impression that it had partnerships or affiliations with them. However, in reality, these companies did not partner with the university to provide special job opportunities for its students or develop curriculum. The FTC alleged that the university's ads could have led prospective students to believe that the school had connections with these employers or that its curriculum was tailored to make its graduates specifically attractive to those companies.

As a result of the FTC's investigation and lawsuit, the University of Phoenix agreed to a $191 million settlement, which included $50 million in direct payments to students and $141 million in cancelled student debt. The settlement provided relief to students who were affected by the university's deceptive practices and false advertising.

The University of Phoenix denied any wrongdoing and stated that the ad campaign in question occurred under prior ownership. However, the FTC's action highlighted the importance of holding educational institutions accountable for their marketing and advertising practices, especially when it comes to for-profit colleges and universities.

Targeted marketing towards people of colour and military veterans

The University of Phoenix has been accused of engaging in deceptive marketing practices, specifically targeting people of colour and military veterans. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged the university with falsely claiming relationships and job opportunities with top companies to lure students. The University of Phoenix's parent company, Apollo Education Group, Inc., was also accused of specifically targeting prospective Hispanic and military service members.

The University of Phoenix has been found to sponsor events for service members, such as concerts, Super Bowl parties, and father-daughter dances, as a way to sidestep an executive order banning "inducements" for securing enrolments. The university has also been accused of using military insignia without proper licenses, creating custom engraved coins featuring the school's logo and the emblems of all military branches, similar to those given to military personnel by officers.

In addition to targeting military service members, the University of Phoenix has been accused of targeting prospective Hispanic students. The FTC's 2019 complaint alleged that the university used a multimedia ad campaign, including ads targeted at military and Latino consumers, to attract students.

The University of Phoenix's targeted marketing towards people of colour and military veterans has resulted in several lawsuits and settlements. In 2019, the FTC settled for $191 million against the university for deceptive and unfair practices in marketing, advertising, and sales, including against service members and veterans. The settlement included $50 million in direct payments to students and $141 million to cancel unpaid balances owed by eligible students.

Inflated graduation and job placement rates

The University of Phoenix has been accused of inflating its graduation and job placement rates. The for-profit university has a low graduation rate of 20%, with only 5% of its online campus students completing their bachelor's degrees within six years. The university's retention rates are also below average, with only 42% of freshmen returning for their second year.

In 2019, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged the University of Phoenix and its parent company, Apollo Education Group, with false advertising and deceptive business practices. The FTC alleged that the university lured students by falsely claiming relationships and job opportunities with top companies like Microsoft, Twitter, and Yahoo!. The university's "'Let's Get to Work' ad campaign" featured these companies, giving the false impression that they worked with the University of Phoenix to create job opportunities for its students.

As a result of the FTC's law enforcement action, the University of Phoenix agreed to pay $50 million in direct payments to affected students and cancel $141 million in private student debt. The FTC sent payments to eligible students in March 2021, totaling more than $45.6 million in relief. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Education announced that it would approve federal student loan forgiveness for students who attended the University of Phoenix and were deceived by the school's job placement claims.

The University of Phoenix has a history of making misleading claims about its graduation rates and job opportunities. In one instance, the university reported that its seniors scored significantly higher than freshmen in all areas on the Educational Testing Service's Measure of Academic Proficiency and Progress (MAPP) test. However, it was later questioned whether the freshmen and seniors were actually "counterparts," as the report claimed, given the university's high transfer rates of mid-career professionals.

The University of Phoenix's low graduation rates and misleading claims have led to significant financial consequences for its students, with many graduating with useless degrees and high amounts of student debt.

Frequently asked questions