Race And University Admissions: A Complex Relationship

The use of race as a factor in university admissions has been a controversial topic for decades. While it is illegal to discriminate against applicants based on race, colour, gender, orientation, disability, or religion, some universities adhere to their own guidelines. In 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the deliberate use of race in college admissions, deeming it unconstitutional. This decision has sparked debates about the impact on diversity and equal opportunities for underrepresented communities. Universities are now exploring alternative methods to promote diversity, such as increasing outreach in communities of colour and rural areas, reevaluating legacy admissions, and reconsidering athletic recruiting.

The US Supreme Court's ruling against affirmative action

In June 2023, the US Supreme Court effectively ended the use of affirmative action in college admissions. By a vote of 6-3, the justices ruled that the admissions programs used by the University of North Carolina (UNC) and Harvard College violate the Constitution's equal protection clause, which bars racial discrimination by government entities.

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts explained that college admissions programs can consider race only to allow an applicant to explain how their race influenced their character. However, he stressed that a student must ultimately be treated as an individual and not on the basis of their race. The ruling states that an applicant's discussion of how race affected their life can be considered, but any benefits must be tied to the student's courage and determination, rather than the colour of their skin.

The decision disregarded prior precedent and societal realities of race discrimination and inequality. It also overruled the 2003 Grutter v. Bollinger decision, in which the court upheld the University of Michigan Law School's consideration of race as one factor among many in assembling a diverse student body.

The Supreme Court's ruling is expected to have the biggest impact on highly selective private colleges and universities, as these institutions are the most likely to use race and ethnicity as factors in admissions decisions. The ruling has also left the door open for service academies, such as the US Naval Academy and West Point, to continue using race-conscious admissions programs, at least for now.

Despite the court's decision, the work to ensure educational opportunities for people of colour continues. Schools and courts recognise the importance of diversity in exposing students to new ideas and ways of thinking and preparing them for a diverse society. While affirmative action is no longer an avenue to achieve this, schools can still take other measures to create equitable campuses and increase opportunities for students of colour.

The impact on diversity in colleges

The impact of universities' admissions decisions on the diversity of their student bodies is a complex and multifaceted issue. While it is illegal to discriminate against applicants on the basis of race, colour, gender, orientation, disability, or religion, some universities adhere to their own guidelines on who they want to admit and what trade-offs they are willing to make.

The use of affirmative action, which considers a student's background characteristics such as race as a factor in the admissions process, has been a widely debated topic in higher education for decades. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to limit affirmative action in higher education is expected to have a significant impact on diversity in colleges, particularly at highly selective private colleges and universities.

The Supreme Court's ruling against the deliberate use of race by universities in admissions decisions is likely to lead to a decline in racial and ethnic diversity on college campuses. This is because affirmative action has been shown to enhance the earnings prospects and increase college completion rates for both minority and non-minority youth. Additionally, research suggests that diversity benefits all students, promoting greater productivity, innovation, and cultural competency.

However, it is important to note that the impact of affirmative action on diversity may vary depending on the type of college. At elite universities, there is stronger evidence of racial preference in admissions, with higher SAT scores and GPAs being more common among certain racial groups. On the other hand, non-elite schools, where the majority of four-year college students enrol, show less preference for racial or ethnic identity.

The consideration of race and ethnicity in admissions decisions is more common among schools with lower admission rates, and private colleges are more likely to consider these factors than public colleges. The trade-off between merit and diversity is a delicate balance, and universities must find a way to increase diversity without compromising the quality of their student bodies.

In conclusion, the impact of universities' admissions decisions on diversity is complex and multifaceted, and while the move away from affirmative action may increase diversity in some respects, it is likely to decrease it in others. Universities must now find new ways to increase diversity on their campuses without explicit consideration of race or ethnicity in their admissions processes.

The role of race-conscious admissions

The US Supreme Court's decision to limit affirmative action in higher education will primarily affect highly selective private colleges and universities. The Court's ruling in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke outlawed specific quotas for minority groups but allowed the use of race as one factor among many in admissions decisions.

The use of race-conscious admissions is more common among schools with the lowest admission rates. Of the 123 selective colleges and universities examined in one study, 74% said they considered race and ethnicity, with 10 describing it as an important factor. The vast majority of these schools were private, not-for-profit institutions.

The benefits of affirmative action in college admissions are a topic of debate. Some argue that it enhances the earnings prospects and raises the college completion rates for both minority and non-minority youth who are admitted. It also provides an opportunity for students to hear from people with different views and experiences, promoting diversity, greater productivity, innovation, and cultural competency.

However, critics argue that race-conscious admissions amount to racial discrimination, harming white and Asian American students. They point to the fact that Asians, in general, have a difficult time getting into elite colleges despite often having the highest test scores, GPAs, and academic extracurricular activities.

The Supreme Court's ruling against the use of race in college admissions in June 2023 will likely lead to a decline in representation of racial minorities in higher education. Colleges are now finding new ways to reach underrepresented communities of colour.

The use of racial quotas

Racial quotas in the education sector refer to reserving a specific number of slots for admission for minority students. The intention behind such quotas is to allow students from underrepresented minorities to access higher education and to establish representation for all. However, the reality is that many institutions have an "unbalanced number" of students from different races, and the use of racial quotas has been a subject of fierce debate. Supporters view it as essential for diversity, while opponents argue that it is a form of discrimination.

The Supreme Court has ruled that while colleges and universities may consider the race of applicants, it must be one of several factors in the admission decision. The race of students may be deemed a "plus factor" that gives them a competitive edge, but it must not be the "defining factor". Race should be considered in a narrowly tailored manner, and institutions must demonstrate that there is no race-neutral approach to meeting student diversity-related goals.

The University of California System, for example, has a long-standing policy against the use of racial and gender quotas in its admission and employment decisions. Similarly, nine states have outlawed affirmative action, including California, Florida, and Idaho.

The debate surrounding the use of racial quotas in university admissions is complex and multifaceted. While the goal of promoting diversity and addressing historical discrimination is important, it must be balanced with ensuring fairness and equality for all applicants, regardless of race.

The consideration of race in private vs public colleges

The consideration of race in college admissions has been a contentious issue in the United States for decades. While it is illegal to discriminate against applicants based on race, colour, gender, orientation, disability, or religion, some universities adhere to their own guidelines on who to admit. This is especially true for private colleges, which have more freedom to make up their own rules.

Private colleges are more likely to consider race and ethnicity in admissions decisions. A 2023 Pew Research Center analysis found that among 123 selective colleges and universities (defined as those that admit half or fewer of their applicants), 74% said they considered race and ethnicity, with 10 describing it as an important factor. The vast majority of these schools (82) were private, not-for-profit institutions. On the other hand, most of the schools that did not consider race and ethnicity at all (22 out of 32) were public colleges and universities.

The consideration of race and ethnicity is more common among schools with the lowest admission rates. In the Pew Research Center analysis, all 24 schools that admitted fewer than 10% of applicants considered race and ethnicity, and among the 48 schools that admitted between 10% and 30% of applicants, all but seven considered race and ethnicity, with five rating it as important. However, among the 51 schools that admitted between 30% and 50% of applicants, just over half (26) considered race and ethnicity, and only four called it an important factor.

The use of affirmative action in college admissions has been a particularly controversial aspect of the debate surrounding race and admissions. Affirmative action policies, adopted by governments and institutions, aim to "improve opportunities for historically excluded groups in American society." In the late 1960s and 1970s, some universities established quotas to achieve a demographically diverse student body, but these were outlawed by the Supreme Court in 1978. Instead, universities began to use race as a "plus" factor in admissions, giving minority applicants an advantage over their white and Asian counterparts.

In 2023, the Supreme Court effectively ended the use of affirmative action in college admissions, ruling that it was unconstitutional to consider race when deciding whether to admit or reject students. This decision is likely to have the biggest impact on highly selective private colleges and universities, which have been the most likely to use race and ethnicity as a factor in admissions decisions.

Frequently asked questions