Shaving Hair: International Students' Visa Photo Woes

does going shaving hair cause issue for international students

Shaving hair has been a controversial topic in the context of student life, with varying opinions and practices across different countries and cultures. While some schools enforce strict policies requiring students, particularly girls, to shave their heads or maintain specific hairstyles, others allow students more freedom in their choice of hairstyle. This issue has sparked debates about hair discrimination, cultural sensitivity, and the potential impact on students' academic performance and personal freedom. International students may encounter varying norms and expectations regarding hair, especially when transitioning between educational institutions in different countries or regions.

Characteristics Values
Shaving hair saves time and soap International schools allow girls to keep their hair, with some stipulations on styling
Shaving hair is a form of control and indoctrination In Ghana, students in kindergarten and older generations in rural public schools are forced to shave their hair
Shaving hair can be a way to deal with hair loss Shaving hair can lead to a dry, itchy scalp, nicks, cuts, razor burn, and ingrown hairs
Shaving hair can be a personal preference or a way to lift spirits Shaving hair can be a way to save money on hair care products and salon visits
Shaving hair can be a way to avoid discrimination Some schools in the US have banned hair discrimination, protecting students with braided extensions, dreadlocks, and other hairstyles

shunstudent

Colonial residue

The practice of forcing students to shave their hair in schools has been observed in several countries, including Ghana, Jamaica, Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, and Uganda. This practice has been attributed to colonial residue, with its roots traced back to the colonial era when captured Africans were forced to shave their hair as a means of humiliation. During the colonial period, Christian missionaries perpetuated the idea that African hair was "unsightly, ungodly, and unattainable," and that short hair would make African girls less desirable to men. As a result, shaving the heads of African girls became a prerequisite for attending missionary schools.

Today, the continuation of this practice in schools has been met with protests and criticism. Many argue that this policy is a legacy of colonialism that perpetuates racism and inherited self-hate. The policy has been described as primitive, backward, and a violation of personal freedom. The double standard in enforcing hair shaving policies, where students of other races and religions are exempt, further highlights its colonial roots.

In recent years, there have been calls for change and a recognition of the importance of natural hair as a part of one's identity, pride, and culture. Some schools have started to relax their hair shaving policies, allowing for more diverse hairstyles. However, the impact of colonial residue is still evident in the varying degrees of enforcement across public and private schools, with public schools tending to be more stringent.

The colonial residue in hair shaving policies is not limited to Africa. Similar practices have been observed in other parts of the world, such as the Caribbean and Asia. It is important to address these systemic issues and work towards creating an environment where natural hair is celebrated, respected, and accepted in schools and workplaces.

While the exact reasons for hair shaving policies in schools may vary, it is clear that the practice has deep-rooted connections to colonial residue.

shunstudent

Gendered expectations

Shaving hair in schools is a practice that has been observed in various countries, including Ghana, Tanzania, and the United States. While the reasons behind this practice may vary, one common justification is that it promotes discipline and uniformity among students. However, the forced shaving of hair, especially for female students, has been widely criticized as a form of gendered expectations and control.

In Ghana, for example, there are reports of girls in government schools being made to shave their heads under the pretext of keeping them "focused on their studies." Some have argued that this is a colonial residue and a form of subjugation, similar to how slaves and widows were forced to shave their hair in the past. Additionally, the practice has been criticized for perpetuating the idea that long hair is a privilege for the rich, as private school students are often allowed to keep their hair while public school students are subjected to bald cuts.

In Tanzania, there are similar reports of hair shaving practices in schools. One commenter on Reddit shared their experience, stating that while mixed-race, Indian, and Arab students were allowed to keep their hair, all the Black girls had to cut their hair short. This has led to feelings of discrimination and a sense of inferiority among the students who were forced to shave their heads.

In the United States, hair discrimination in schools has also been an issue, particularly for Black students. In recent years, several states and cities have passed laws to protect students from hair discrimination, recognizing that certain hairstyles are associated with Black culture. For example, New York City's guidance explicitly protects hairstyles such as fades and headscarves, while California has passed a law to protect students after a student was suspended for having lines shaved into his hair.

The expectation for female students to shave their hair in schools is often rooted in gendered notions of discipline, control, and uniformity. It is seen as a way to curb teenage beauty obsessions and prevent distractions in the classroom. However, these expectations can have negative psychological impacts on students, affecting their sense of identity and self-worth. Additionally, the practice can reinforce gender stereotypes and contribute to a culture of subjugation and discrimination.

While the practice of forced hair shaving in schools is often justified under the guise of discipline and uniformity, it is important to recognize the gendered expectations and power dynamics that underlie this practice. By challenging these expectations and promoting inclusive policies, schools can create a more equitable and empowering environment for all students, regardless of their gender or cultural background.

shunstudent

Racial discrimination

Shaving hair in schools has been a controversial topic, with some people arguing that it is a form of racial discrimination. This issue has been prevalent in various countries, including Tanzania, Kenya, Ghana, and the United States. While some schools argue that shaving hair leads to uniformity and neatness among students, others claim that it is a colonial residue and a form of control and subjugation.

In Tanzania and Kenya, there have been reports of female students being forced to shave their heads bald, causing public uproar and sparking debates about the relevance of such policies in the modern era. Some schools defend their policies by stating that they respect the cultural differences of other races and religions, such as Muslims, Hindus, and students of races other than Black, who are not required to shave their heads. However, this has led to accusations of racial discrimination, as seen in a South African school where black girls were forced to straighten their hair, while white students were exempt from such rules.

In Ghana, there is a similar debate, with some people arguing that the rule to trim hair for ladies going to high school needs to be re-evaluated. It is argued that hair length or style does not affect a student's academic performance or their ability to respect teachers. Additionally, the congested and unhygienic conditions in boarding schools, as well as the presence of perverted male teachers, are cited as more pressing issues than hair length.

In the United States, several states, including California, New York, and New Jersey, have passed laws banning discrimination based on hairstyles or textures associated with a person's race or nationality. These laws aim to protect students, particularly Black students, from facing negative consequences for their hair choices at school. There have been instances where students have been disciplined or suspended for having shaved lines in their hair or wearing braided extensions, which have been deemed distracting or inappropriate by school officials. The new laws and policies aim to create more inclusive school environments and address implicit and explicit bias.

Overall, the issue of shaving hair in schools has raised important discussions about racial discrimination, cultural sensitivity, and the need for inclusive policies that respect the diversity of students. While some argue for uniformity and neatness, others emphasize the importance of individual freedom, cultural expression, and the potential negative impact of such policies on students' self-esteem and academic performance.

shunstudent

Student agency

In the context of hair shaving, the concept of student agency takes on a nuanced dimension. While there are cultural and regional variations, the act of forcing students, particularly girls, to shave their heads has been viewed as a form of control and subjugation. This practice, prevalent in some parts of Ghana and Tanzania, is often justified under the guise of maintaining discipline, uniformity, and focus on studies. However, critics argue that it stems from colonial residue and perpetuates a slave mentality.

International students, particularly girls, in certain schools are expected to trim or shave their hair. This requirement is sometimes imposed under the pretext of maintaining a neat and uniform appearance or curbing distractions. However, it is important to recognize that hair is deeply intertwined with personal identity and cultural expression. Denying students the agency to make their own choices about their hair can lead to feelings of degradation and loss of self-expression.

To uphold student agency and create an inclusive environment, schools should reevaluate their policies regarding hair. Instead of imposing restrictive rules, schools can focus on setting reasonable standards of neatness and hygiene while allowing students to express their cultural identities through their hairstyles. This approach fosters a sense of belonging and empowers students to take ownership of their appearance and cultural heritage.

Furthermore, student agency extends beyond the realm of hair shaving. It encompasses a wide range of decisions and choices that students can make throughout their educational journey. This includes selecting courses that align with their interests, shaping their learning paths through project choices or extracurricular activities, and providing input on topics that affect their learning experiences. By encouraging student agency, schools create an environment that values diversity, fosters self-discovery, and prepares students to become proactive and engaged citizens.

shunstudent

School policies

In Japan, for example, schools have a reputation for having strict hair policies. Students with brownish hair have been made to prove its natural colour, and some have even been forced to dye their hair black to conform to Japanese standards. Similarly, in Malaysia, students with non-black hair have faced discipline and even been forced to shave their heads.

On the other hand, some schools in the Philippines do not have any hair policies, allowing students to express themselves freely through their hair choices.

In the United States, the discussion around hair policies in schools has centred on discrimination, particularly against Black students. Several states, including New York and New Jersey, have implemented protections against hair discrimination, recognising that Black students have been disproportionately disciplined for their hairstyles. The nation's largest teachers' union has also called for more inclusive school hair policies.

In some cases, schools have argued that dress codes, including hair policies, are critical to school culture and that certain hairstyles can be distracting or promote gangs. However, students and advocates have pushed back, arguing that these definitions of professionalism and discipline are rooted in racism.

Additionally, in Kenya, there has been debate about whether schoolgirls should be required to shave their heads. While some argue that it promotes uniformity and discipline, others believe that it can negatively impact girls' self-esteem and confidence.

To address discrimination, some countries have implemented laws to protect students' rights. For example, in the UK, the Equality Act 2010 prohibits indirect discrimination based on protected characteristics, such as race, and schools have been challenged to change their policies to comply with this legislation.

Overall, the topic of school hair policies is complex and multifaceted, balancing the goals of uniformity and discipline with the rights of students to express themselves and maintain their cultural and religious identities. While some schools and countries favour strict policies, others prioritise freedom and inclusivity.

Frequently asked questions

Shaving hair does not cause issues for international students per se, but it is a controversial topic in some countries. For example, in Ghana, ladies are expected to trim their hair when going to high school, especially in government schools. International schools usually allow girls to keep their hair, although they may have to follow certain styling guidelines. In Tanzania, shaving students' hair in public and private schools is also a common practice, with some people arguing that it is a colonial residue.

There are several reasons given for forcing students, particularly girls, to shave their hair. One reason is uniformity and neatness, with the belief that having short hair makes students look more formal and tidy. Another reason is to control students and indoctrinate them to conform and not stand out. In some cases, it is also done to tame lice infestations.

Yes, there is a growing movement to ban hair discrimination in schools and workplaces. In 2023, California, New York, and New Jersey passed laws banning discrimination based on hairstyles or textures associated with a person's race or nationality. New York City, Cincinnati, and Montgomery County, Maryland, have also issued similar bans. Other states and cities, like Baltimore, are considering implementing such laws.

There have been several instances of hair discrimination in schools. In 2017, a charter school outside Boston gave detentions to Black girls who wore braided extensions. In 2018, a referee in New Jersey forced a mixed-race wrestler to cut his dreadlocks. In the same year, a student in California was suspended for having lines shaved into his hair. These incidents have sparked debates about implicit and explicit bias and the need for more inclusive school hair policies.

Written by
Reviewed by

Explore related products

Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment