American University Students Lack Geography Knowledge

American university students' lack of geographical knowledge has been a topic of concern for educators and policymakers alike. This issue was brought to light by a report from the US Government Accountability Office (GAO), which revealed that a significant number of American students tested below proficient in geography on the Nation's Report Card. The report highlighted the lack of emphasis on geography in the American education system, with social studies teachers spending as little as 10% of their time on the subject. Furthermore, geography is not a required course in most states, contributing to the students' limited understanding of the subject.

Geography not a required subject in most states

Geography is not a required subject in most American states. As of 2013, only 17 states required a geography course in middle school, and just 10 states made it compulsory for students to take a geography course to graduate from high school.

The subject is often incorporated into social studies classes, but teachers reported spending only 10% of their time teaching geography, with more focus on history, civics/government, and economics. This lack of dedicated geography instruction means that students may not receive a comprehensive education in the subject, contributing to the perception that American university students know little about geography.

The emphasis on other subjects, such as reading, math, and science, poses a challenge to providing geography education. Federal law requires students to be tested in these areas, and state education officials and teachers struggle to allocate time and resources to geography while meeting the demands of these core subjects.

The lack of mandatory geography education in most states has raised concerns about students' essential geography skills and their preparedness for careers in fields that rely on geographic knowledge, such as geospatial technologies. The Department of Labor projects that employment in geography-related fields will grow by 29% from 2012 to 2022, outpacing the average growth rate for all occupations.

The recognition of the importance of geography education has led to calls for increased funding and support for geography programs in national education legislation. Efforts by organizations like the American Association of Geographers (AAG) and Esri are making headway in advocating for change and improving geography education in the United States.

Teachers spend less than 10% of time on geography

A 2015 report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that more than half of social studies teachers spend 10% or less of their time on geography. Geography is often taught as part of social studies, alongside history, civics, and economics. Teachers may prioritize these subjects over geography due to a heavy emphasis on tested subjects like reading, math, and science at both the national and state levels. Federal law, for instance, mandates testing in reading, math, and science.

This limited time allocation for geography instruction has significant implications for student learning. Geography is not a required subject in most states, with only 17 states mandating it in middle school and 10 states requiring it for high school graduation as of 2013. As a result, students may lack essential geography skills and knowledge.

The GAO report highlights the importance of geography education in preparing students for a globalized world and meeting future workforce needs. The Department of Labor projects a 29% growth in employment for geography specialists from 2012 to 2022, outpacing the average growth rate for all occupations. Adequate geography education is crucial for students to develop the skills needed for various careers, such as maintaining transportation infrastructure, responding to natural disasters, and tracking endangered species.

To address the challenges in geography education, the GAO report offers several suggestions. Firstly, it emphasizes the need to increase the focus on geography as a required subject in schools. This includes incorporating geography into social studies classes more effectively. Secondly, the report highlights the importance of teacher preparation and professional development in geography, ensuring that educators have the necessary knowledge and resources to teach the subject effectively. Finally, the report suggests improving the quality of geography instructional materials and increasing the use of geographic technology in classrooms.

By implementing these strategies, educators can ensure that students receive a well-rounded education that includes a stronger foundation in geography, better preparing them for a globally interconnected future.

Lack of funding for geography-focused programs

A lack of funding for geography-focused programs is a significant challenge for American universities. Geography is often taught as part of social studies, and teachers reported that they spent only about 10% of their time on the subject. This is due to an increased focus on other subjects, such as reading, math, and science, which are tested at the national and state levels. Federal law, for instance, mandates testing in these areas.

State education officials and teachers interviewed by the GAO researchers cited difficulties in allocating time and resources to geography education because of the emphasis on these other subjects. The heavy emphasis on tested subjects at the national and state levels leaves little room for universities to prioritize geography.

Additionally, geography is not a required subject in most states. As of 2013, only 17 states required a geography course in middle school, and 10 states required it for high school graduation. This lack of mandatory geography education means that universities cannot assume a basic level of geographical knowledge from their students, and so must decide whether to prioritize it in their own curricula.

Furthermore, geography teachers often lack an educational background in the subject, and universities may struggle to find qualified candidates. This is partly due to the limited number of geography courses offered at the college level, which can make it challenging for aspiring teachers to access the necessary training.

Poor quality of geography instructional materials

Poor-quality geography instructional materials are a significant factor in the lack of geographical knowledge among American university students. The issue is not merely that teachers are using materials of questionable quality from the internet, but that this practice leads to inconsistencies in the quality and rigor of the materials used across different classrooms and grade levels.

Teachers often supplement their district-mandated content with materials from the internet, and Teachers Pay Teachers is the most consulted source for this. Teachers spend around seven hours per week searching for materials and an additional five hours creating their own. This work is done privately and without supervision, and there is little research on the quality and effectiveness of online materials. As a result, teachers may rely on trial and error or advice from peers when selecting resources.

The lack of standardization means that the quality and rigor of materials can vary significantly from classroom to classroom, and even from grade to grade within the same school. This inconsistency can create a disjointed learning experience for students, hindering their geographical knowledge and understanding.

Furthermore, teachers often lack the necessary training and support to effectively integrate digital resources with their district-mandated curriculum. They may also hold misconceptions about geography education, believing it to be primarily about memorizing places on maps rather than understanding the relationship between people and the environment.

The poor quality and inconsistency of geography instructional materials contribute to the challenges faced by American university students in acquiring geographical knowledge and skills. Addressing this issue is crucial for ensuring a consistent and high-quality geography education for all students.

Misconception of geography as fact-based memorisation

A significant misconception about geography education is the belief that it primarily involves fact-based memorisation, such as labelling places on maps. This perception is shared by teachers, principals, and parents, who often prioritise other subjects like history, civics, government, and economics within the social studies curriculum. As a result, geography receives minimal attention in the classroom, with teachers reporting that they dedicate only about 10% of their time to teaching the subject.

This misconception has contributed to the inadequate geography education that American students receive. The focus on memorisation fails to recognise the dynamic and analytical nature of geography, which involves understanding the complex relationships between people and their environment. It is not merely about knowing the names of places but grasping the interplay of various geographic factors that shape our world.

The misconception also influences the way geography is assessed. Standardised tests, such as the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), contribute to the perception that geography is primarily about memorisation. These tests often emphasise recall tasks, such as identifying places on a map, rather than assessing higher-order thinking skills. As a result, students are not adequately evaluated on their critical thinking and analysis capabilities, which are essential in geography.

Furthermore, the misconception of geography as fact-based memorisation fails to recognise the practical applications of geographic knowledge. Geography is integral to numerous aspects of modern life, including the economy, foreign policy, and emerging fields like geospatial technologies. The US Department of Labor projects a 29% growth in employment for specialists in geography from 2012 to 2022, outpacing the average growth rate for all occupations. Thus, the misconception not only undermines the importance of geographic literacy but also overlooks the career prospects and real-world applications that a robust geography education can offer.

To address this misconception, it is essential to redefine what geography education entails. Geography is more than memorising facts and places; it involves developing spatial thinking skills, analysing data, understanding cultural and environmental interactions, and applying geographic concepts to solve real-world problems. By shifting the focus from rote memorisation to critical thinking and spatial analysis, educators can transform how students engage with and understand the subject.

Frequently asked questions