Diversity In Academia: Legality Of Homogenous Student Bodies

The topic of racial diversity in universities is a highly debated issue, with some universities being criticized for their lack of diversity and others for their race-based admissions policies. In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the consideration of race in college admissions, allowing policies that foster racial and ethnic diversity on campus. While this decision was praised by civil rights groups as a step towards equality, it has also faced criticism and legal challenges from those who argue that it creates an unequal playing field for applicants. Additionally, some universities have been called out for their use of race-based filters in recruitment, targeting specific racial groups, and even excluding certain races from welcome programs and scholarships. With the ongoing discussion surrounding racial diversity in higher education, it is clear that universities must carefully navigate the complex issue of creating an inclusive and equitable environment for all students while also addressing historical discrimination and promoting cross-cultural learning.

US universities used recruitment tools to target white students

In 2022, it was revealed that US universities had been using the nation's leading student selection platform, Naviance, to target white students in their recruitment efforts. Naviance is a service hired by secondary schools that gives students an online portal to search for campuses that fit their abilities and interests. Universities then use the resulting data to decide which students they will actively recruit.

However, it was discovered that Naviance included a "Caucasian-only" option in its filters for student applicants, allowing universities to create whites-only lists for student recruitment. This practice was in place for several years until 2019, when a company executive found out about it and stopped it. The universities of Kansas, Massachusetts-Boston, and Southern Maine were among those known to have used the filter.

The revelation sparked outrage and concern among experts, who described the creation of race-based filters as "deeply troubling" and "shocking." While there has been no known protest by universities, the company suggested that the practice might have been more widespread than initially thought.

It is important to note that US Supreme Court rulings in 2016 upheld the consideration of race in college admissions to foster racial and ethnic diversity on campus. University officials contend that having a sizable number of minority students enrolled enhances the educational experience for all students.

Additionally, there have been instances where universities have been criticized for allegedly segregating students by race or excluding white students from certain programs and events. For example, the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) hosted a "Black, Latinx, and Native American Family Orientation" and a "Black Surf Week," which excluded families of white students.

While there is no definitive answer to whether it is illegal for universities to have only white students, the use of recruitment tools to target specific races, especially to create whites-only lists, is highly controversial and ethically questionable.

HBCUs have enrolled rising percentages of non-Black students

In the United States, affirmative action policies allow universities to consider race in admissions, fostering diversity and providing equal opportunities for racial minorities who have historically faced discrimination. While it is not explicitly stated whether it is illegal for universities to have only white students, such policies enable universities to actively promote the enrollment of minority students.

Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) are a prime example of institutions that have embraced diversity and inclusivity. While originally founded to educate Black students, HBCUs have increasingly enrolled rising percentages of non-Black students over the years. In 2022, non-Black students made up approximately 24% of enrollment at HBCUs, a notable increase from 15% in 1976. This shift in demographics indicates a broader trend of HBCUs attracting a more diverse student body.

The changing composition of HBCUs can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, HBCUs have become more accessible to students of all races, promoting themselves as inclusive institutions. Additionally, HBCUs offer a more affordable alternative to comparable non-HBCUs, with a 28% lower cost of attendance. This factor is particularly significant in addressing the financial obstacles faced by Black students, as a higher percentage of them take on debt compared to their white peers.

The impact of HBCUs extends beyond enrollment numbers. HBCUs have been a driving force behind the socioeconomic mobility of their Black alumni. HBCU graduates working full-time throughout their careers can expect to earn 56% more in additional income than students who attended non-HBCUs. This significant boost in lifetime earnings underscores the role of HBCUs in empowering their graduates to climb the socioeconomic ladder.

Furthermore, HBCUs have excelled in specific academic fields, particularly in STEM. A notable 25% of African American graduates with STEM degrees are from HBCUs. This contribution to the STEM field is remarkable, considering that HBCUs constitute only 3% of the country's colleges and universities. The success of HBCU graduates in various professions is evident, with HBCU alumni representing substantial percentages of Black engineers, lawyers, doctors, and judges.

US Supreme Court upholds race-based college admissions

In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the consideration of race in college admissions, rejecting a white woman's challenge to a University of Texas program designed to boost the enrollment of minority students. The court, in a 4-3 ruling written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, decided in favor of the university and turned aside the conservative challenge to a policy intended to foster racial and ethnic diversity on campus. The ruling ended an eight-year legal challenge to the affirmative action admissions system used by the University of Texas at Austin brought by Abigail Fisher, who was denied a place in 2008. Affirmative action is a policy under which racial minorities historically subject to discrimination are given certain preferences in education and employment.

University officials contend that having a sizable number of minorities enrolled exposes students to varied perspectives and enhances the educational experience for all students. The justices upheld a 2014 ruling by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that had endorsed the school's "limited use of race in its search for holistic diversity." The University of Texas admits most freshmen through a program that guarantees a place to students in the top 10% of their Texas high school graduating classes. It uses other factors, including race, to admit the remainder.

The University of Texas is not the only educational institution to have been challenged for its treatment of applicants of different races. In 2022, it was reported that the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) prohibited families of white students from participating in numerous college welcome programs. In the same year, a University of Michigan professor filed a Title VI complaint against the University of South Carolina for hosting a workshop that only accepted non-white students.

In 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ended affirmative action in higher education, stating that race should never be used "as a stereotype or negative." The Court scrutinized the race-based categories being used in college admissions as "imprecise" and "overbroad." It recognized that in certain limited situations, including "remediating specific, identified instances of past discrimination that violated the Constitution or a statute," it could serve as a compelling interest for race-based government action.

Universities host segregated events and graduation ceremonies

In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld race-based college admissions, rejecting a white woman's challenge to a University of Texas program designed to boost the enrollment of minority students. The ruling ended an eight-year legal challenge to the affirmative action admissions system. The university's president, Gregory Fenves, praised the decision, stating that race continues to matter in American life and that educating students in a diverse environment is one of the most effective ways to prepare them for the real world.

However, some universities have been criticized for hosting segregated events and graduation ceremonies. For example, the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) has hosted welcome programs and orientation events exclusively for Black, Latinx, and Native American students. More than three dozen colleges and universities have hosted special graduation ceremonies for specific racial, gender, or sexual orientation groups. These include Weber State University's "LatinX Grad Ceremony", Harvard University's "affinity celebrations", and the University of Nevada, Las Vegas's "APMIE, Latinx, Lavender, and Native Convocation".

While supporters of these segregated events and ceremonies argue that they create a sense of belonging and inclusivity for marginalized students, critics contend that they promote segregation and separation. For instance, "Dirty Jobs" host Mike Rowe criticized Harvard University's affinity celebrations, stating that they encourage diverse groups to celebrate separately, which he likened to "segregation".

It is important to note that the legality of these segregated events and graduation ceremonies is unclear and may vary depending on the specific circumstances and local laws. While Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in programs receiving federal financial assistance, it is uncertain how this applies to the specific context of universities hosting segregated events and graduation ceremonies.

US universities used race-based filters to produce whites-only lists for student recruitment

In the United States, it is illegal for universities to discriminate against students based on their race or ethnicity during the admissions process. This is known as affirmative action, a policy under which racial minorities who have historically been subject to discrimination are given certain preferences in education and employment.

However, there have been several instances where US universities have been accused of using race-based filters to produce whites-only lists for student recruitment. In April 2022, it was revealed that several universities, including the universities of Kansas, Massachusetts-Boston, and Southern Maine, had used the nation's leading student selection platform Naviance, which offered a Caucasian-only filter for choosing applicants. This situation lasted for several years until 2019 when a company executive discovered and stopped it.

The creation of such race-based filters has been described as "deeply troubling" and "frankly nauseating". Ceceilia Parnther, an assistant professor of higher education at St John's University-New York, noted that there were no known circumstances in the US where white students faced disadvantages in college access based on their race. Another expert, Joel Schwarz, a cybersecurity consultant and adjunct professor at Albany Law School, acknowledged the existence of inherent biases in society and stated that he "could certainly see some schools might have certain predispositions".

In addition to the use of race-based filters, there have been other instances of racial segregation in US universities. For example, the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) hosted welcome programs and graduation ceremonies exclusive to specific racial and ethnic groups, excluding white students. Similarly, the University of South Carolina was accused of hosting a workshop that only accepted non-white students, leading to a Title VI complaint being filed against the university.

While universities defend their efforts to promote racial and ethnic diversity on campus, the use of race-based filters in student recruitment remains a controversial and complex issue in US higher education.

Frequently asked questions