Who Owns Student Inventions? University Ip Laws Explained

The question of whether a university owns a student's invention is a complex one. While students, including PhD students, are typically not employees of the university, there is usually some form of agreement between the student and the university that may govern ownership of any inventions made by the student. This agreement can vary from university to university, and it is important for students to carefully review and understand the terms of any contracts or agreements they sign with the university. In general, if a student is compensated by the university for work involving research, investigation, or the creation of software that leads to an invention, then the student may be considered an employee and the university may claim ownership of the invention. However, there are cases where the university may still have an ownership interest in the invention if a faculty member or other university employee contributed to the invention. In such cases, the university and the student may co-own the intellectual property rights. It is always recommended that students seek legal advice and carefully review any contracts or agreements before signing to ensure they understand their rights and obligations regarding intellectual property.

Students are not employees of the university

Students, including PhD students, are not typically employees of the university. However, there is usually some form of agreement between the student and the university that may govern the ownership of any inventions made by the student.

The primary relationship of a student with the university is educational. Their main purpose is pursuing a course of study rather than earning a livelihood. Students are not considered employees of the university, even if they are engaged in research, teaching, work-study, or another related or comparable position at an educational institution. Their working relationship with the university is obtained as a result of or in conjunction with their studies.

In the US, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled in 2016 that graduate students working as teaching or research assistants at private universities are employees with the right to collective bargaining. This decision reversed a 2004 ruling and opened the door for union drives at private universities across the country. However, this ruling specifically applied to graduate students and not all students.

In the UK, a court case (Oxford University Innovation Limited v. Oxford Nanoimaging Limited) involving a former student, Mr Bo Jing, and the university, set a precedent for ownership of student inventions. Mr Jing initially worked on a project as a research intern and later as a DPhil student. The court concluded that any inventions made during his employment as an intern belonged to the university. However, the more complex part of the case was determining the ownership of inventions made while Mr Jing was studying. There was no suggestion that he was an employee at this stage, but the contract he signed as a DPhil student incorporated the University IP Statute and Regulations, which appeared to transfer ownership of IP to the University. The judge decided that the IP terms in the contract were fair, and the university was entitled to claim ownership of the IP.

Student-inventors may co-own intellectual property with the university

Students are not typically employees of the university, and therefore, they usually own any inventions they make. However, there is usually some form of agreement between the student and the university that may govern the ownership of any inventions made by the student. This could be in the form of a contract or other documentation signed by the student upon enrolment.

For example, the University of Missouri System's Collected Rule and Regulation (CR&R) 100.020.D.6 states that students are generally entitled to own any inventions made during their enrolment and are not required to assign ownership to the university. However, there are exceptions where the student meets the definition of an "employee" as defined by the university, in which case, they may be required to assign their rights to the university.

Similarly, in the UK, a court case involving Oxford University and a former student, Mr Bo Jing, set a precedent regarding ownership of intellectual property. Mr Jing, a former research intern and DPhil student, developed a super-resolution imaging device while working on a project at the university. The court found that the university was entitled to claim ownership of the intellectual property due to the contract signed by Mr Jing, which incorporated the University IP Statute and Regulations. This case highlights the importance of carefully reviewing any contracts or agreements that may impact the ownership of intellectual property.

In summary, while students are generally considered the owners of their inventions, it is essential to review any relevant contracts or agreements with the university to understand the specific terms and conditions governing intellectual property ownership. These agreements may vary depending on the student's enrolment status, the use of university resources, and other factors outlined in the university's policies.

The university may have an ownership interest via faculty members

The University of Missouri System's Collected Rules and Regulations (CR&R) 100.020.D.6 governs ownership of inventions created by students enrolled at the university. The document provides that students are generally entitled to own any invention made during their enrollment and are not required to assign ownership to the university. However, there are certain circumstances under which the university may claim ownership. For example, if a student is compensated by the university for work involving research, investigation, or the creation of computer software that leads to an invention, they are considered an "Employee" under the CR&R, and their invention would be subject to university ownership.

In the case of student-generated inventions, the university may have an ownership interest via the contributions of a faculty member or other university employee. This means that even if the university does not have ownership rights through the student inventor, they may still have partial ownership if a faculty member was involved in the invention's development. In such cases, the university and the student would co-own the intellectual property rights.

The university's claim to ownership in these cases is based on the employment relationship with the faculty member or employee, who is typically required to assign their rights in the invention to the university. This scenario highlights the complex nature of intellectual property ownership in academic settings, where collaborations between students and faculty members can lead to shared ownership arrangements.

It is important to note that each university may have its own policies and agreements regarding intellectual property ownership. Students and faculty members should carefully review their institution's specific guidelines, as well as any relevant employment contracts or student agreements, to understand their rights and obligations regarding inventions developed during their time at the university.

Students are entitled to own inventions made during their enrolment

Students are generally entitled to own the inventions they make during their enrolment. However, there may be circumstances in which the university can claim ownership or a share of the invention.

Firstly, it is important to note that students, including PhD students, are not typically considered employees of the university. This means that the rules regarding employee inventions do not usually apply to students. Normally, an inventor is the first owner of their invention. However, if the invention is made during the course of their employment, the employer may own the invention.

In the case of students, there is usually some form of agreement between the student and the university that governs the ownership of any inventions made during their enrolment. This agreement may be included in the student's enrolment or admission paperwork, or it may be a separate document. It is important for students to carefully review any agreements they sign with the university to understand their rights regarding intellectual property.

In the United States, the University of Missouri System's Collected Rule and Regulation (CR&R) 100.020.D.6 states that students will generally be entitled to own any inventions made during their enrolment and will not be required to assign their ownership to the university. However, there are exceptions to this rule. For example, if a student meets the definition of an employee, as defined by the university, and the invention was developed as part of their service to the university, they may be required to assign their ownership to the university.

Additionally, if a student develops an invention as part of a university class project, competition, or extracurricular activity using university resources, they may still be considered the owner of the invention. However, the university may have an ownership interest in the invention if a faculty member or other university employee contributed to the invention as a co-inventor. In such cases, the university and the student would co-own the intellectual property rights.

It is worth noting that each university may have its own policies and procedures regarding student inventions, and it is essential for students to familiarise themselves with their specific institution's guidelines. While students typically own their inventions, there may be instances where the university has a legitimate claim to ownership or a share of the invention, especially if university resources were utilised in its development.

Students may not be required to assign ownership to the university

Students may not be required to assign ownership of their inventions to the university. This is because students, including PhD students, are not typically employees of the university. However, there is usually some form of agreement between the student and the university that may govern the ownership of any inventions made by the student.

For example, at the University of Missouri, students are generally entitled to own any invention made during their enrollment and are not required to assign ownership to the university. However, there are exceptions to this rule, such as when a student meets the definition of an "employee" as defined by the university. In such cases, the student may be required to assign their ownership rights to the university.

It is important to note that even if the university does not have direct ownership of a student's invention, it may still have an ownership interest if a faculty member or other university employee contributed to the invention. In this case, the university and the student would co-own the intellectual property rights.

The specific ownership arrangements can vary depending on the university and the nature of the invention. For instance, if a student develops an invention as part of a university class or competition using only the standard resources available to all students, they would typically own the intellectual property. On the other hand, if a student voluntarily assigns their rights to the university or if the invention is made with significant university resources or funding, the university may have a stronger claim to ownership.

To clarify the ownership arrangements, it is essential to review any relevant contracts, agreements, or policies between the student and the university. These documents will outline the specific rights and obligations of both parties regarding intellectual property.

Frequently asked questions