Retaining Students: Strategies For Dorm Life And University Success

Many American universities require students to live in campus housing for at least their first year. While universities argue that this helps students transition to life away from home, others believe that universities are simply hungry for more revenue. The empirical evidence seems to support the latter, as campus housing prices have risen far more than the price of housing in the broader economy. Despite this, some universities continue to enforce rules that require freshmen to stay in university housing.

Dormitories with students from the same major can help students find others with similar interests

Dorm life is a quintessential part of the college experience in the US, with many universities requiring students to live in dormitories for at least their first year. One of the reasons for this is that students with shared majors can be placed together, helping them find others with similar interests. This can be a great advantage for students' academic and social lives, and universities have recognised this as a way to retain students in dorms.

Students who live with others on the same course can benefit from a ready-made support network of people who understand the demands of their major. For example, students can easily form study groups, exchange notes, and help each other with assignments. This shared experience can foster a sense of community and camaraderie, making students feel more connected to their university and their peers.

Living with others from the same major can also help students develop valuable social connections and friendships. Students with shared interests are more likely to socialise and participate in extracurricular activities together, creating a sense of belonging and encouraging retention. This is especially beneficial for students who may be shy or find it challenging to meet new people.

Additionally, universities can organise social events and activities specifically tailored to the interests of students within these major-specific dormitories. This might include movie nights related to their field of study, guest lectures, or field trips that cater to their shared academic interests. These activities can enhance the student experience and create lasting memories.

Major-specific dormitories also provide an excellent opportunity for peer-to-peer learning and mentorship. Upperclassmen can offer guidance and advice to freshmen, sharing their experiences and insights. This can be particularly valuable for students transitioning to university life, helping them navigate their course requirements and providing academic support from day one.

While there are benefits to this approach, it is important to recognise that some students may prefer a more diverse living environment, where they can interact with peers from different academic backgrounds. Therefore, universities should offer a mix of housing options, including major-specific dormitories and those that encourage intermixing between different fields of study. Ultimately, the goal is to provide students with a supportive and enriching living environment that complements their academic pursuits and enhances their overall university experience.

Universities enforce strict rules that require freshmen and sophomores to stay in university housing

Many American universities require freshmen and sophomores to live in university-owned housing. This is often justified by the need to help students transition to life away from their families and to provide some level of supervision and conduct oversight. Additionally, universities argue that living in dormitories helps students find others with similar interests, fostering a sense of community and potentially improving academic performance.

However, there is also a financial incentive for universities to enforce such rules. By requiring freshmen and sophomores to live in university housing, institutions can augment revenues without formally raising tuition fees. This allows universities to charge above-market rates for housing that may be less appealing to students, who might prefer more typical apartment-style living arrangements with more privacy.

Some universities are facing revenue pressures due to declining or stagnant enrollment, high bond payments, and ageing dormitory infrastructure. As a result, they are strictly enforcing these on-campus housing requirements for freshmen and, in some cases, sophomores as well. This trend is particularly noticeable in states like Ohio, where some universities are mandating on-campus housing for students who live within commuting distance, potentially flouting state law.

While universities claim that on-campus living improves academic outcomes and provides a better overall experience, the evidence supporting these claims is questionable. The high cost of campus housing and food plans, often coupled with subpar quality, suggests that universities may be exploiting their monopoly power to charge students exorbitantly for room and board.

Despite the potential drawbacks, there are also benefits to living on campus. For instance, some students appreciate the safety and cleanliness of university housing. Additionally, on-campus residences can facilitate community-building and provide opportunities for students to connect with peers sharing similar interests or academic majors.

Students may be forced to pay above-market rates for housing, as universities are hungry for revenues

Universities are increasingly facing criticism for their role in the student housing crisis. In the US, many universities require students to live in campus housing for at least their first year, and sometimes longer. This gives universities a monopoly on housing, allowing them to charge above-market rates for accommodation, which is often of lower quality than private housing.

The cost of campus housing has increased far more than the cost of private housing. For example, a 2014 study showed that from 1976 to 2013, the inflation-adjusted rate of increase in public four-year college housing prices was about 72%, compared with less than 5% for housing in the broader economy. This is despite the fact that students often prefer private housing, which offers more privacy and better facilities.

The high cost of campus housing can be a significant financial burden for students, especially those from low-income backgrounds. In some cases, students are forced to take on additional work or even avoid university altogether due to the high cost of housing. This can undermine efforts to widen participation in higher education and exclude students from poorer backgrounds.

The rising cost of student housing is due to several factors, including increasing energy costs, staff wages, supply chain costs, debt servicing, and the rising cost of construction. Universities also argue that they need to generate revenue from housing to make up for dwindling enrollment numbers and high bond payments.

However, there is evidence that universities are taking advantage of their monopoly position to charge excessive rates for housing. This is known as "price gouging" and is considered an unethical business practice. By forcing students to pay above-market rates for housing, universities are able to augment their revenues without formally raising tuition fees.

The high cost of student housing is not just a US problem. In Toronto, Canada, students are also facing a housing crisis, with a shortage of affordable options on and off-campus. The lack of affordable housing options has forced students to be resourceful and creative in securing housing, often taking on multiple jobs to make ends meet.

The student housing crisis is a complex issue with no easy solutions. However, there are several recommendations to improve the situation, including increasing the supply of affordable housing, providing more financial support for students, and regulating universities to prevent price gouging. Ultimately, universities need to focus on their primary role of providing education and work to reduce the cost of attendance for students.

Students may prefer typical apartment-style housing with more privacy and private bathrooms

Students may prefer the typical apartment-style housing that comes with more privacy and private bathrooms. This is because dorm life often involves sharing space with other students of the same gender, which can result in a loss of privacy and personal space. Many students find it challenging to adjust to living with roommates, and issues with roommates can negatively impact their entire year.

On the other hand, apartment-style living provides residents with more privacy and independence. Students have the freedom to make their own schedules and customise their living spaces to fit their needs. Apartments usually offer private bedrooms and bathrooms, allowing students to enjoy a higher level of privacy.

Additionally, apartments often provide access to shared amenities like backyards, swimming pools, and community facilities such as gyms. They also typically include kitchens and laundry facilities, which dorms usually lack. This enables students to cook their own meals, which can be more convenient and cost-effective than expensive meal plans associated with dorm life.

Apartment-style living also fosters independence. Students are forced to make decisions and manage responsibilities that they might not have encountered while living in a dorm. This includes paying bills, such as electricity and WiFi, which can be a fair introduction to a more independent lifestyle.

While apartments offer greater privacy and independence, it's important to consider the potential impact on social life. Dorm life is renowned for its social advantages, with numerous opportunities to meet new people and make friends. Apartment living may limit these spontaneous social interactions, as socialising would primarily occur through roommates or extracurricular activities.

Some universities have spacious dorms that are conveniently located close to classes

The location and size of university dorms are important factors in a student's experience and can influence their decision to stay in student accommodation. Indiana Wesleyan University in Marion, Indiana, offers spacious dorms conveniently located close to classes. This setup makes it easy for students to balance their studies and social life.

The University of Cincinnati's Campus Recreation Center is another example of spacious dorms close to classes. The recreation centre features a 40-foot climbing wall, an Olympic-sized pool, an indoor river for swimming upstream, a six-court gym, and a fitness centre with over 200 machines. The dining hall caters to different tastes with seven taste stations.

Washington University in St. Louis is also known for its spacious and conveniently located dorms. The university organises student housing sections by year, with underclassmen living on the southwest side of the Danforth campus. This setup makes it easier for freshmen to navigate the campus and access their classes. Additionally, the dorms offer personal bathrooms and a cleaning service, providing added convenience and comfort for students.

The University of Texas at Austin is another example of a university with spacious dorms close to classes. The Callaway House features a rooftop pool, providing a unique study environment and a relaxing atmosphere.

Spacious dorms located close to classes offer several benefits for students, including convenience, a better balance between academic and social life, and enhanced comfort. These factors can positively impact a student's overall university experience and may contribute to their decision to remain in student accommodation.

Frequently asked questions