How Mandatory Attendance Would Affect University Students

University housing policies are important guidelines that universities establish to govern where and how students reside during their studies. These policies can have a significant impact on various aspects of student life, including community atmosphere, cost of living, and involvement in campus activities. One such policy is the requirement for students to live in university dormitories, which can enhance student involvement and ensure access to resources, creating a closer-knit student community. However, this policy can also have economic implications, particularly concerning the price elasticity of demand for dormitory space and subsequent room rates. This rule affects the dynamics of supply and demand, with universities potentially increasing room rates without worrying about a decrease in occupancy due to the lack of alternatives for students.

Demand for dorm rooms may increase

A rule that mandates university students to live in dormitories would likely increase the demand for dorm rooms. Currently, students have alternatives such as renting off-campus or living at home, making the demand for dorm rooms relatively elastic. However, if a rule is imposed that all students must live in dorms, the demand for dorm rooms would become more inelastic as students would lack viable alternatives. This shift in demand dynamics could lead to an increase in room rates as universities might take advantage of the limited availability of dormitory space and raise prices without worrying about a decrease in occupancy.

The impact of such a rule on room rates is influenced by the concept of price elasticity of demand. Price elasticity of demand measures how the quantity demanded of a good or service responds to changes in its price. In the context of university dormitory space, if demand is elastic, a small increase in price can lead to a significant decrease in the quantity demanded as students may opt for alternative housing options. However, when a rule makes it mandatory for students to live in dormitories, the demand becomes less elastic, indicating that changes in room rates will have a smaller impact on the quantity demanded since students have no other choices.

The mandatory residence policy can have both positive and negative consequences. On the one hand, it can enhance student involvement in campus activities, foster a closer-knit student community, and ensure easier access to academic support and resources. On the other hand, it may lead to overcrowding in dormitories, potentially impacting the quality of living and making studying more challenging due to the crowded environment.

While the rule may result in increased demand for dorm rooms, it is important to consider the trade-offs and potential challenges that may arise, especially regarding the economic burden on students and the quality of their on-campus living experience.

Room rates may decrease

While some sources suggest that room rates may increase due to inelastic demand, a few sources argue that room rates may decrease.

A rule that mandates university students to live in dormitories would increase the demand for dorm rooms. This is because students would have no choice but to live in the dorms, making the demand inelastic. Universities may take advantage of this inelastic demand and increase room rates without worrying about a decrease in occupancy.

However, a few sources argue that this rule may decrease room rates. This is because the rule would increase the price elasticity of demand for dorm rooms. Currently, the demand for dorm rooms is relatively inelastic because students don't have many alternatives and are often required to live on campus. However, if a rule is imposed that all students must live in dorms, the demand for dorm rooms would become more elastic as students would have the option to live off-campus. With increased elasticity, universities may have to lower room rates to attract students.

Therefore, while it is possible that room rates may decrease, it is important to consider the specific context and factors influencing demand and supply.

Overcrowding may occur

The potential for overcrowding is further exacerbated by the fact that many students prefer to live on campus, even if it is not mandated. This is due to the traditional college experience it offers, the higher academic success it brings, and the greater sense of belonging and community it fosters. Students who live on campus also have easier access to university resources, such as the writing centre, the library, the gym, and the health centre. This proximity to campus resources can positively impact a student's academic performance. Research from the University of Oregon and West Texas A&M University supports this, showing that on-campus students have higher grades and earn their degrees at higher rates.

However, it is important to note that not all colleges require first-year students to live on campus. Some colleges with two- or three-year residency requirements even allow strong students to petition to live off campus sooner if they can demonstrate academic and personal maturity. Additionally, some colleges may not have enough dormitory space to handle all their students, especially in the case of urban schools or universities experiencing rapid expansion.

Furthermore, the potential for overcrowding may be mitigated by the fact that on-campus housing is not always a viable option for certain students. For example, adult learners, older students, and nontraditional students often choose not to live on campus due to other responsibilities, such as full-time jobs and childcare. Additionally, part-time students are generally not allowed to live on campus, as housing options are typically designed for full-time students.

Quality of living may be impacted

A rule that requires university students to live in dormitories can have a significant impact on the quality of their living conditions.

Firstly, it can lead to overcrowding in dormitories as every enrolled student has to secure a room. This, in turn, can result in a reduction in the quality of living conditions within the dorms. Overcrowding can also lead to an increase in stress levels among students, which can have a detrimental effect on their overall quality of life. Research has shown that excessive and continuous stress can trigger various diseases and negatively impact an individual's quality of life.

Secondly, such a rule can affect the economic dynamics of university living arrangements. Specifically, it can influence the price elasticity of demand for dormitory space. By making dormitory living a necessity, the demand for dorm rooms becomes less elastic, allowing universities to increase room rates without significantly affecting occupancy. Students become less sensitive to price increases as they have no other legal options for housing.

However, it is important to note that the impact on room rates may vary depending on the specific context. In some cases, a rule mandating on-campus residence may decrease room rates if it encourages more students to live on campus, thereby increasing the supply of rooms.

Overall, while a rule requiring university students to live in dormitories can have benefits in terms of access to academic support and student services, it can also negatively impact the quality of living for students by potentially increasing financial burdens and stress levels.

Student community may be strengthened

A rule that requires university students to live in university dormitories can have a significant impact on the student community. While the demand for dormitory rooms may increase, potentially leading to overcrowding and higher room rates, there are also benefits to creating a closer-knit student community.

Firstly, such a rule can enhance student involvement in campus activities and foster a sense of community. Students living on campus are more likely to participate in university events, clubs, and organizations, leading to more social interaction and a stronger sense of belonging. This can positively impact their overall university experience, as they develop friendships and connections with their peers.

Secondly, a mandatory residence rule can ensure that students have easier access to academic support and student services. With everyone living on campus, universities can centralize resources and provide efficient support systems, benefiting those who may otherwise struggle with accessing these services. This can lead to improved academic performance and a more supportive environment for students facing challenges in their studies.

Additionally, living on campus can promote a sense of safety and security. Students residing together can look out for one another, and the university can more effectively implement safety measures and emergency response protocols. This aspect can be particularly advantageous for students who are living away from home for the first time, providing them with a sense of comfort and reassurance.

While there may be concerns about the potential negative consequences of such a rule, including the financial burden of higher room rates and the possible decrease in living standards due to overcrowding, the potential benefits to the student community are significant. A mandatory residence rule can create a cohesive and supportive environment, fostering a sense of community and enhancing students' overall well-being during their university years.

Frequently asked questions